Legal Opinion

Office of The Public Advocate v. Public Utilities Commission & Verizon New England, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 28, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.

[¶ 1] The Office of the Public Advocate1 appeals from orders of the Public Utilities Commission relating to the establishment of an “alternative form of regulation” (AFOR), pursuant to 35-A M.R.S.A. §§ 9101-9105 (Pamph.2002), for Verizon New England, Inc., and allowing Verizon to increase its basic service rates. The Public Advocate argues that the orders should be vacated because the Commission failed to comply with statutory requirements governing the regulation of telephone utilities, particularly section 9103(1) requiring that the Commission ensure that the rates for local telephone…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  2. Town of Madison, Department of Electric Works v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  3. Industrial Energy Consumer Group v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  4. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  5. Pub. Advocate v. PUB. UTILITIES COM'NSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Office of the Public Advocate v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  2. Office of Public Advocate v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  3. Conservation Law Foundation v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API