Legal Opinion
Industrial Energy Consumer Group v. Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided June 22, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRudman, J.
[¶ 1] The Industrial Energy Consumer Group, 1 (“IECG”) appeals from an order issued by the Public Utilities Commission approving a Stipulation between the Central Maine Power Company (“CMP”) and the Office of Public Advocate providing for an Alternative Rate Plan. We affirm the Commission’s order.
L BACKGROUND
[¶ 2] In 1991, Title 35-A M.R.S.A. § 3195 2 was enacted, conferring on the Commission the authority to establish rea sonable rate-adjustment mechanisms that promote efficiency in the transmission and distribution of utilities.
[¶ 3] In 1995, the Commission approved a stipulation, thereby…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Central Maine Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Quirion v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Public Advocate v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
3Cited by3 opinions
- Consumers for Affordable Health Care, Inc. v. Superintendent of InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Office of the Public Advocate v. Public Utilities Commission et al.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2023
- Office of The Public Advocate v. Public Utilities Commission & Verizon New England, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003