Office of the Public Advocate v. Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtJabar, J.
[¶ 1] The Maine Office of the Public Advocate (OPA) and Bucksport Mill, LLC, appeal from an order of the Maine Public Utilities Commission approving an alternative rate plan' (ARP) for Bangor Gas . Company, LLC. They argue that the Commission erred by (1) calculating the ARP initial rate base by utilizing an unimpaired, “original cost” valuation of Bangor Gas’s assets rather than the impaired “acquisition cost” incurred by Bangor Gas’s parent company; and (2) including in its calculation of Bangor Gas’s revenue requirement a portion of the utility’s regulatory proceeding expenses amortized…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Central Maine Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
- Pine Tree Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- Trask v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Houlton Water Company v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bruce D. Taylor v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- Office of the Public Advocate v. Public Utilities Commission et al.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2023
- Ed Friedman v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- Enhanced Communications of Northern New England, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- Conservation Law Foundation v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017