Legal Opinion

Office of Public Advocate v. Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 26, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, C.J.

[¶ 1] At issue in the present case is the method by which the Public Utilities Commission sets the rates that telephone companies may charge their ratepayers. Specifically, we are called upon to determine whether the Legislature intended to authorize the Commission to approve alternative forms of rate regulation without making a good faith attempt to compare the rates obtainable under those regulations with the rates that would be projected under traditional rate-of-return proceedings.. [¶ 2] The Office of Public Advocate and the American Association of Retired Persons challenge the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Raymond v. RaymondSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  2. Town of Madison, Department of Electric Works v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  3. Maine Public Service Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  4. American Ass'n of Retired Persons v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. DiVeto v. KjellgrenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SanchezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Bertl v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  3. Quiland, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API