Legal Opinion

New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 24, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] NYNEX appeals from an order of the Public Utilities Commission adopting a rule that requires a 20% reduction in intrastate access charges. 1 NYNEX argues that the Commission’s rulemaking order violated the Commission’s Alternative Form of Regulation (“AFOR”) order by reducing the intrastate access charges without an offsetting adjustment to make the rate change revenue-neutral. 2 NYNEX argues that the order altered the revenue base provided in the AFOR order, thereby violating NYNEX’s right to a fair rate of return, due process, and nonconfiscatory rates.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cambridge Electric Light Co. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Cumberland Farms Northern, Inc. v. Maine Milk CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Office of Public Advocate v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  2. Office of The Public Advocate v. Public Utilities Commission & Verizon New England, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  3. Verizon New England, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API