Brown v. Guy
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.
Malpractice action against a doctor of chiropractic. Verdict for defendant. Plaintiff’s motion for new trial was granted upon the ground of insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. Defendant appeals.
Upon the consideration of a motion for a new trial the court must make an independent appraisal of the evidence, including all presumptions and reasonable inferences, and must judicially determine whether the judgment effects a miscarriage of justice. In considering such motion the trial court is not bound by a conflict in the evidence but may be governed by any substantial proof that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. HustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. RobargeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Ballard v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sáez v. Municipio de PonceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
- Brown v. GuyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Hughey v. CandoliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Bernson v. BowmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Mertes v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.