Legal Opinion
Paiute-Shoshone Indians of Bishop Community of Bishop Colony v. City of Los Angeles
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 14, 2011No. 07-16727PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop Community of the Bishop Colony, California, an Indian tribe formally recognized by the United States, filed this action against Defendant City of Los An-geles for an order restoring Plaintiff to possession of land that the City took long ago in a deal with the United States. The district court dismissed the action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(7) because it ruled that, under Rule 19 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the United States was a required party that Plaintiff eould not join. The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Eastern Enterprises v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Peabody Western Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Harold Dawavendewa, a Single Man v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, an Arizona Corporation, the Navajo NationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Nanko Shipping, USA v. Alcoa, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Dine Citizens Against Ruining v. Bureau of Indian AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- S.B. v. Cal. Dep't of Educ.District Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Martinez v. Clark CountyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2012
- California Dump Truck Owners Ass'n v. NicholsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.