Harold Dawavendewa, a Single Man v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, an Arizona Corporation, the Navajo Nation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
OVERVIEW
Harold Dawavendewa (“Dawavendewa”) sued the Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District (“SRP”) for employing a hiring preference policy in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 1 In particular, he alleged that SRP’s lease with the Navajo Nation (“Nation”) required it to preferentially hire Navajos at the Navajo Generating Station (“NGS”). The district court dismissed Da-wavendewa’s complaint for failure to join the Nation as an indispensable party.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we have jurisdiction over Dawavendewa’s timely…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by135 opinions
- Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v. PatakiNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Edward Yashenko v. Harrah's Nc Casino Company, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Peabody Western Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- N.D. v. Hawaii Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Wilbur v. LockeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.