Raul Gonzalez, Jr. v. Chandra Spencer Franscell, Strickland, Roberts & Lawrence, a Professional Corporation Los Angeles County
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
“A case is moot only if interim events have ‘completely and irrevocably eradicated the effects of an allegedly improper ruling.” In re Pintlar Corp., 124 F.3d 1310, 1312 (9th Cir.1997) (quoting Wong v. Dep’t of State, 789 F.2d 1380, 1384 (9th Cir.1986)). In light of the settlement, Gonzalez no longer faces a significant prospect of illegal inspection or disclosure. The settlement does not, however, affect Gonzalez’s claims for damages based on past conduct.
Spencer acted under color of state law. She was retained to represent state entities and their employees in litigation. She…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Richardson v. McKnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Harriet Rissetto v. Plumbers and Steamfitters Local 343, a Business Entity, Form Unknown, Michael Beavers and Does 1-25, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Rodolfo EchegoyenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Matsuo Yoshida and Chisato Yoshida v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Filarsky v. DeliaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Delia v. City of RialtoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Keith H. v. Long Beach Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
- A.C. v. Erica CortezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Armonia Rigsby v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.