Legal Opinion
United States v. Rodolfo Echegoyen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 12, 1986No. 83-5295PublishedCited by 148 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge.
OVERVIEW
Rudolfo Echegoyen initially pled not guilty to an indictment charging him and various others with several counts of federal narcotics law violations. Echegoyen filed pretrial motions to suppress certain evidence seized by law enforcement officials in two separate searches. The district court denied these motions. Thereafter, Echegoyen entered a conditional plea of guilty to three of the counts in the indictment. From this conditional plea of guilty, Echegoyen appeals the district court’s denial of his motions to suppress. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
The issues…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by148 opinions
- Teresa Sheehan v. City and County of San FrancisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Jamie Kirkpatrick v. County of WashoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. SarkisianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Lee Erwin JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jario A. MEJIA, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.