Legal Opinion

Richardson v. McKnight

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 23, 1997No. 96-318PublishedCited by 424 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breyer

The issue before us is whether prison guards who are employees of a private prison management firm are entitled to a qualified immunity from suit by prisoners charging a violation of 42 U. S. C. § 1983. We hold that they are not.

r — I

Ronnie Lee McKnight, a prisoner at Tennessee s South Central Correctional Center (SCCC), brought this federal constitutional tort action against two prison guards, Darryl Richardson and John Walker. He says the guards injured him by placing upon him extremely tight physical restraints, thereby unlawfully “subject[ing]” him “to the deprivation of” a right “secured…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by424 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Plymouth Ambulance ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Earnest D. Shields v. Illinois Department of CorrectCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  3. Kailash C. Pani, M.D., and Kailash C. Pani, M.D., P.C. v. Empire Blue Cross Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. Filarsky v. DeliaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Ashoor Rasho v. Willard ElyeaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017

419 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API