Legal Opinion
Delia v. City of Rialto
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 9, 2010No. 09-55514PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed September 9, 2010 [621 F.3d 1069], is amended as follows:
Slip Opinion page 13785, first full paragraph, lines 7-8 [621 F.3d at 1077] replace “knew they could not directly do without clearly violating the Fourth Amendment” with “declined to do directly.”
With that amendment, Judge Rawlinson voted, and Judges Goodwin and Bennett recommended, to deny the Petition for Rehearing En Banc.
The full court has been advised of the Petition for Rehearing En Banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote.
Appellee Steve A. Filarsky’s Petition for Rehearing En Banc filed on…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Mattos v. AgaranoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- John Ellins v. City of Sierra MadreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Bravo v. City of Santa MariaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Dominick Perniciaro, III v. Hampton LeaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Davis v. PowellDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.