Legal Opinion
Sereika v. Patel
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 25, 2006No. 04 Civ. 8854(VM)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Michael Sereika (“Sereika”), appearing pro se, brings this action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), alleging a violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. Sereika alleges that the defendants Gautam Patel (“Patel”), Ysmael Joaquin 1 (“Joaquin”), Chito Evangelista 2 (“Evangelista”), Dr. Mark Glover (“Glover”) (collectively, the “individual Defendants”), the Federal Bureau of Prisons (the “BOP”), the BOP…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Lloyd v. LeeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Alster v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Lipkin v. United States Securities & Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Price v. ReillyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Catania v. HerbstDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.