Legal Opinion
Lipkin v. United States Securities & Exchange Commission
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 22, 2006No. 06 CIV.0939 RJHPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HOLWELL, District Judge.
In this action, pro se plaintiffs Michael Lipkin and Joshua Shainberg allege that, during a civil enforcement action brought against them in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in 1999, SEC attorneys Jack Kaufman and Bohdan S. Ozaruk defamed Lipkin and Shainberg, lied to the court, and concealed exculpatory evidence. The enforcement action culminated in a jury verdict against Lipkin and Shainberg, and the court issued a final judgment that included…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Foster v. Federal Emergency Management AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Regnante v. Securities & Exchange OfficialsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Aryai v. Forfeiture Support Associates, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Smith v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2017
- Catania v. HerbstDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.