Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Doe

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided September 25, 2000No. 3244PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STILWELL, Judge:

Laurie Jackson appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Costello Milligan, arguing the court erred in finding the statute of limitations had expired. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

On April 1, 1994, as Jackson stood by the open door of a vehicle parked beside a gas pump at a service station, another *554vehicle struck the car and then drove off. The impact caused the car door to hit Jackson and, as a result, she suffered head and facial injuries. Jackson did not know who was driving the other car.

On March 17, 1997, Jackson filed her initial action against the unknown…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Kraly v. VannewkirkOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Paschal v. State Election CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  5. Cafe Associates, Ltd. v. GerngrossSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cline v. J.E. Faulkner Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  2. Brewer v. Stokes Kia, Isuzu, Subaru, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Gause v. SmithersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  4. Jackson v. DoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  5. Young ex rel. Estate of Armstrong v. South Carolina Department of Disabilities & Special NeedsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API