Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Young ex rel. Estate of Armstrong v. South Carolina Department of Disabilities & Special Needs

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 13, 2007No. 26371Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Pleicones

Respondent alleged her child died as the result of Pam Gaither’s negligence. She brought a timely wrongful death and survival action against appellant South Carolina Department of Disabilities and Special Needs (State Agency). After the statute of limitations expired, respondent was permitted to amend her complaint under Rule 15(c), SCRCP, to add appellant Fairfield/Newberry Disabilities Special Needs Board (Local Board) as a defendant.

The circuit court filed an order granting summary judgment under Rule 56(d), SCRCP, holding:

1) Gaither and Local Board are employees of State Agency;

2) Gaither…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Madison Ex Rel. Bryant v. Babcock CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Nelson v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Jackson v. DoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API