Legal Opinion

Brewer v. Stokes Kia, Isuzu, Subaru, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 2, 2005No. 3985PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHearn, C.J.

This appeal arises after summary judgment was granted to Stokes Kia, Isuzu, Subaru, Inc., in a claim for breach of contract, conversion, and violation of certain consumer protection laws brought by a purchaser whose car had been repossessed in what was alleged to have been a yo-yo sale. We affirm.

FACTS

In January 2000, Rebecca Brewer’s automobile quit running, and she began shopping for another car. Brewer visited two car dealerships before visiting Stokes Kia. At both of the prior dealerships, Brewer was unable to purchase a car because of her poor credit rating. When Brewer arrived at Stokes…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Singleton v. Stokes Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Worley v. Yarborough Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  4. Gilbert v. MillerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Jackson v. DoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. M & M GROUP, INC. v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  2. Byrd v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  3. Zinn v. CFI Sales & Marketing, Ltd.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
  4. Park Place Corp. v. Seaman Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2016
  5. Donald and Carlee Simmons v. Benson Hyundai, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API