Legal Opinion
Mathews v. Hansen
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 29, 2003No. 45A05-0305-CV-221PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
Today we are called upon to construe the provisions of Indiana Code sections 31-14-20-2 and 81-19-4-6 regarding a man's duty to register as a putative father. 1 Appellant-respondent Joshua J. Mathews, the alleged biological father of KH., appeals the trial court's order entered in favor of the appellee-petitioner Adam C. Hansen regarding K.H.'s adoption. Specifically, Mathews urges that it was error to grant Hansen's motion to dismiss his challenge to the adoption decree entered by the trial court. Mathews raises a number of issues, arguing that the trial court erred when…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Donnella, Admrx. v. CradyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1962
- Sims v. BeamerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- INB National Bank v. Moran Electric Service, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Monsanto Co. v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Wawrinchak v. U. S. Steel Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Godby v. WhiteheadIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Adoption of D.C. v. R.C.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Stulajter v. Harrah's Indiana Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- In the Matter of the Adoption of J.W. T. McD. v. G.C.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012