Legal Opinion
Stulajter v. Harrah's Indiana Corp.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 20, 2004No. 45A05-0311-CV-572PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRSCH, Chief Judge.
Milan Stulajter appeals the trial court's dismissal of his complaint against Harrah's Indiana Corporation (Harrah's). In his complaint, Stulajter claimed that Harrah's breached its statutory duty by sending him marketing materials and admitting him to its casino after he placed himself on the casino's voluntary self-exclusion list. Because we conclude that a violation of Indiana gaming regulation does not give rise to a private cause of action, we affirm the trial court's decision.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Harrah's operates gambling establishments in Indiana,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sims v. BeamerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Walling v. Appel Service Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Right Reason Publications v. SilvaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Mark Merrill v. Trump Indiana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- City of Muncie v. PetersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Godby v. WhiteheadIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- John Doe 1 v. Indiana Department of Child ServicesIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
- Kimrey v. DonahueIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Smith & Wesson Corp. v. City of GaryIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- McCown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.