Legal Opinion

Adoption of D.C. v. R.C.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 2008No. 22A01-0709-CV-425PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRADFORD, Judge.

Appellant-Respondent H.R. (“Biological Mother”) appeals the trial court’s order denying her motion to set aside an adoption decree in favor of Appellee-Petitioner R.C. (“Adoptive Mother”) on the basis that Indiana Code section 31-19-14-4 bars her challenge as untimely. Upon appeal, Biological Mother claims that the adoption decree, which was entered without notice to her, was void for lack of personal jurisdiction and violated her due process rights. Concluding that Indiana Code section 31-19-14-4 is unconstitutional as applied to the instant circumstances, we reverse…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Prewitt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. LinkAmerica Corp. v. AlbertIndiana Supreme Court · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In the Interest of E.R.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In re C.L.S.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Grabowski v. WatersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. A.B. v. Jo.D.Indiana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. In re J.M.A.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API