Monsanto Co. v. Miller
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NEAL, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Defendant-appellant, Monsanto Company (Monsanto), brings this interlocutory appeal following the denial of its motion to dismiss by the Greene Circuit Court in favor of plaintiffs-appellees, Robert, Phyllis, Stephen and Beverly Miller (Millers). Monsanto claims Millers' suit for damages is barred by the applicable statute of limitations.
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS
As stated in Millers' complaint, in 1970 Bloomfield Silo Co. constructed a silo on land owned by Millers, to be used in connection with Millers' dairy farm. The inside of the concrete silo was coated with…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Dague v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Shideler v. DwyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Hipolite Egg Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Margaret E. Coffey v. Van Dorn Iron Works, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Bernstein v. BankertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Barnes v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Rosnick v. MarksNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- Fager v. HundtIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.