Legal Opinion
Stegall v. Kynaston
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 31, 1980No. 3428-3-IIIPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, C.J.
—Thurman Stegall and his wife, holders of a promissory note, obtained a judgment against the makers, Glade B. Kynaston and his wife. The Kynastons appeal.
The dispositive question on appeal is whether the resale of a mobile home in violation of RCW 43.22.340 1 is illegal, rendering the note unenforceable.
In 1973, the Stegalls purchased a mobile home to be placed upon a residential lot. The mobile home was moved to the lot and attached to a permanent building.
In 1976, they sold their residence to the Kynastons. As part of the purchase price, the Stegalls received a note for $5,500 from the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fleetham v. SchneeklothWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Allison v. Medicab International, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
- La France Fire Engine Co. v. Town of Mt. VernonWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- State Ex Rel. Phillips v. WN. LIQUOR CONTROL BD.Washington Supreme Court · 1962
- Yakima Lodge No. 53, K. of P. v. SchneiderWashington Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- S. A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense (Varig Airlines), Plaintiff v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Kedzie & 103rd Currency Exchange, Inc. v. HodgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Haberman v. ElledgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- Smith v. Skone & Connors Produce, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Smith v. Skone & Connors Produce, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.