Haberman v. Elledge
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.
—Conrad Elledge, the defendant below, appeals a judgment and lien foreclosure decree entered in favor of the plaintiffs below, William Haberman, Sr., and William Haberman, Jr., father and son, d/b/a B & J Water Well Drilling, following a dispute over a well drilling contract. Elledge contends that the Habermans' failure to comply with a WAC regulation construing RCW 18.104, the Washington Water Well Construction Act (Act), bars recovery on the underlying drilling contract as a matter of law. We conclude that the contract was valid and enforceable and affirm the judgment.
We note initially that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Washington State Bar Ass'n v. Great Western Union Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Murphy v. Campbell Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1971
- Cheney v. City of Mountlake TerraceWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Fleetham v. SchneeklothWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Stewart v. HammondWashington Supreme Court · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Amtruck Factors v. International Forest ProductsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- Glesener v. BalholmCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- Western Community Bank v. HelmerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- Smith v. Skone & Connors Produce, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Smith v. Skone & Connors Produce, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.