Legal Opinion

Haberman v. Elledge

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 3, 1986No. 13505-8-IPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.

—Conrad Elledge, the defendant below, appeals a judgment and lien foreclosure decree entered in favor of the plaintiffs below, William Haberman, Sr., and William Haberman, Jr., father and son, d/b/a B & J Water Well Drilling, following a dispute over a well drilling contract. Elledge contends that the Habermans' failure to comply with a WAC regulation construing RCW 18.104, the Washington Water Well Construction Act (Act), bars recovery on the underlying drilling contract as a matter of law. We conclude that the contract was valid and enforceable and affirm the judgment.

We note initially that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Washington State Bar Ass'n v. Great Western Union Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Murphy v. Campbell Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Cheney v. City of Mountlake TerraceWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Fleetham v. SchneeklothWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Stewart v. HammondWashington Supreme Court · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Amtruck Factors v. International Forest ProductsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  2. Glesener v. BalholmCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  3. Western Community Bank v. HelmerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  4. Smith v. Skone & Connors Produce, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Smith v. Skone & Connors Produce, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API