Legal Opinion
Smith v. Skone & Connors Produce, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 12, 2001No. 19581-3-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, J.
Commission merchants must post an itemized list of their charges and may not vary those charges except by written contract with individual consignors. RCW 20.01.080. James Smith, a potato farmer, had a verbal agreement with Skone & Connors Produce, Inc., a commission merchant that cleaned, packed, and sold Mr. Smith’s potatoes. After Mr. Smith’s 1995 crop had been harvested, Skone & Connors sent him a statement with *202packing charges substantially higher than the charges posted in 1988 pursuant to the statute. Mr. Smith sued for the overpayment and for other discrepancies in his account. After…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Badgett v. Security State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Landmark Development, Inc. v. City of RoyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Boyd v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bryan Kelley And Dorre Don Llc v. Beverly L. TondaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Smith v. Skone & Connors Produce, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Parker v. ClinicCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Parker v. Tumwater Family Practice ClinicCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003