Legal Opinion

Smith v. Skone & Connors Produce, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 12, 2001No. 19581-3-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

26 P.3d 981 (2001)

107 Wash.App. 199

James SMITH d/b/a Smith Farms, Appellant,

v.

SKONE & CONNORS PRODUCE, INC., Respondent.

No. 19581-3-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Two.

July 12, 2001.

John G. Schultz, George E. Telquist, Leavy, Schultz, Davis & Fearing, Kennewick, for Appellant.

Brian H. Miller, Dano, Miller, Ries, Othello, Christopher F. Ries, Moses Lake, for Respondent.

SCHULTHEIS, J.

Commission merchants must post an itemized list of their charges and may not vary those charges except by written contract with individual consignors. RCW 20.01.080. James Smith, a potato…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Badgett v. Security State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Landmark Development, Inc. v. City of RoyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Boyd v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bryan Kelley And Dorre Don Llc v. Beverly L. TondaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  2. Parker v. ClinicCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. Blue Pacific Management Corp. v. AndersonHigh Court of American Samoa · 2004
  4. Parker v. Tumwater Family Practice ClinicCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API