Legal Opinion

Lasley v. Helms

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 10, 1994No. 1 CA-CV 93-0182PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARBARINO, Judge.

The plaintiffs, George and Velma Lasley, George Easley’s children, and his former wife, appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, William K. Helms, M.D., and the trial court’s denial of their motion for new trial, both of which were based on the trial court’s finding that their claims were barred by the statute of limitations. We reverse and remand.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In reviewing the trial court’s grant of summary judgment, we view the facts and reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Sanchez v. South Hoover HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Gutierrez v. MofidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Hill-Shafer Partnership v. Chilson Family TrustArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. McAlister v. CitibankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dawson v. WithycombeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Walk v. RingArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Green v. Lisa Frank, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. Chicago Insurance v. ManterolaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  5. Jones v. MedtronicDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API