Legal Opinion

Walk v. Ring

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2002No. CV-01-0090-PRPublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Justice.

¶ 1 This is another in the long line of claimed professional negligence cases in which our courts have examined the manner in which the discovery rule and constructive fraud theories apply to toll the statute of limitations.

¶2 Jimmye Walk (Plaintiff) brought an action against Dr. Dale J. Ring (Defendant) for dental malpractice in 1997. The trial judge granted summary judgment to Defendant on the basis of the statute of limitations, and the court of appeals affirmed. See Walk v. Ring, No. 1 CA-CV-00-0233 (filed Feb. 8, 2001) (mem. dec.). We granted review to examine and…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Richard Augustine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Pearl v. City of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  2. Dawson v. WithycombeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. Sherrill v. SouderTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Ritchie v. KrasnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. Airfreight Express Ltd. v. Evergreen Air Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API