Legal Opinion

MacKinnon v. Hanover Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 3, 1984No. 82-582PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Per curiam

This interlocutory transfer without ruling from the Superior Court (Souter, J.) arises out of an action for declaratory judgment to determine coverage under a homeowner’s liability insurance policy. In an underlying tort action, the present intervenor, Kimberly A. MacKinnon, on behalf of her daughter, claims liability against the present plaintiff, James F. MacKinnon, on theories of battery and negligent infliction of emotional distress, arising from alleged acts of assault in the form of sexual abuse by the plaintiff against his six-year-old stepdaughter.

The present defendant, Hanover…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Burd v. Sussex Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  2. Patrons-Oxford Mutual Insurance v. DodgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. Travelers Insurance Co. v. ColeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Hanover Insurance Co. v. NewcomerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Steinmetz v. National American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Allstate Insurance v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Breland v. SchillingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  4. Worcester Insurance v. Fells Acres Day School, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  5. Fairfield Insurance Co. v. Stephens Martin Paving, LPTexas Supreme Court · 2008

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API