Legal Opinion

Steinmetz v. National American Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 21, 1978No. 1 CA-CIV 3764PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.

The sole issue raised by this appeal is whether the trial court properly determined that the only jury issue in this declaratory judgment action was the intentional nature of the act of the insured as compared to the intention of the insured to injure.

This litigation was instituted by appellee, National American Insurance Company (National American), against its insured William Currie and appellant Howard Steinmetz to determine its liability coverage for an alleged tort committed by Currie against Steinmetz. Based upon a jury verdict, the trial court entered…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vanguard Insurance Company v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  2. Clark v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  3. Butler v. BehaegheColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Scott Rankin v. Farmers Elevator Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  5. Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. WagnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Transamerica Insurance Group v. MeereArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. VagnozziArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. Globe American Casualty Co. v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  5. Klatt v. Continental Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API