Legal Opinion
Cathedral Candle Co. v. United States International Trade Commission
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 14, 2003No. SLIP OP. 03-131; Court 03-00196PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion for judgment upon the agency record. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants unlawfully deprived them of their share of 2001 and 2002 distributions under the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000. 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (2000). The Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i). The Court denies Plaintiffs’ motion and grants judgment for Defendants.
Background
On September 4, 1985, the National Candle Association filed an antidumping petition alleging material injury or threat of material injury to a domestic industry…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dofasco Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Furniture Brands International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Decca Hospitality Furnishings, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Guangdong Chemicals Import & Export Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Suntec Industries Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.