Legal Opinion
Suntec Industries Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided December 6, 2013No. Slip Op. 13-147; Court 13-00157PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MUSGRAVE, Senior Judge:
The complaint claims jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i) challenging the initiation of Certain Steel Nails from the People’s Republic of China; Final Results of Third Antidumping Administrative Review; 2010-2011, 78 Fed.Reg. 16651 (Mar. 18, 2013) CARS Final ”), on the ground of improper notice to the plaintiff. The defendant moves to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction under USCIT Rule 12(b)(1) or alternatively for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under Rule 12(b)(5). The court denies both motions.
Background
Prior…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Suntec Industries Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Blink Design, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Fabuwood Cabinetry Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Suntec Indus. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.