Legal Opinion
Dofasco Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 23, 2004No. SLIP OP. 04-16; Court 03-00819PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EATON, District Judge.
Before the court is plaintiff Dofasco Inc.’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to USCIT Rule 56. Defendant United States (“Government”), on behalf of the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”), and defendant-intervenor United States Steel Corporation (“USSC”), each cross-move for summary judgment. Also before the court is the Government’s motion, pursuant to USCIT Rules 7 and 12(f), to strike Dofasco’s annexed statement of undisputed facts. Pending resolution of this action, Dofasco further moved to stay the deadline by which it was to submit its…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Abitibi-Consolidated Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- International Custom Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Dofasco Inc. v. United States, and United States Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Government of the People's Republic of China v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Tokyo Kikai Seisakusho, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.