State v. Taylor
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
Before discussing defendant’s assignment of error, we, pursuant to Rule 2 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, will consider the propriety of the defendant’s sentence to “prevent manifest injustice” to the defendant. Defendant did not assign error to the sentence he received, nor did he present the question in his appellate brief.
Possession of stolen goods is a statutory crime created by the Legislature and is of recent vintage. State v. Perry, 305 N.C. 225, 287 S.E. 2d 810 (1982). The possession statutes were passed to provide protection for society in those incidences where…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. HartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. BizzellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- State v. MedlinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.