Legal Opinion

State v. Medlin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1987No. 8614SC883PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Defendant raises four of his original twelve Assignments of Error on appeal, as well as an additional Assignment of Error number thirteen upon our granting of defendant’s motion to amend the record. All other Assignments of Error not raised on appeal are deemed abandoned. Rule 28(b)(5), N.C. Rules App. P.

Defendant’s fifth Assignment of Error raises the issue of whether he could be lawfully convicted of seven counts of conspiracy to break or enter on these facts. He argues that the evidence does not show seven separate and distinct transactions, but rather shows a single scheme…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. KisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. State v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. RozierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. BrewerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. State v. BillingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. State v. GlissonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  5. State v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API