Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 4, 1986No. 8520SC536PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

The essential elements of feloniously possessing stolen property are (1) possession of personal property, (2) valued at more than $400.00, (3) which has been stolen, (4) the possessor knowing or having reasonable grounds to believe the property to have been stolen, and (5) the possessor acting with a dishonest purpose. State v. Davis, 302 N.C. 370, 373, 275 S.E. 2d 491, 493 (1981). See G.S. 14-71.1, 14-72. On appeal, defendant assigns as error the *282court’s finding the evidence sufficient to show that (1) defendant knew or had reasonable grounds to believe the property had been…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. BatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RousonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. Charles Lee Allen v. Carroll R. Lowder Aaron J. Johnson Nathan Rice, and W. Franklin McGuirt David W. Chester Laura Perry Tommy Allen Sam KellyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  3. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. State v. WebbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API