Legal Opinion

State v. Bizzell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 18, 1981No. 808SC1172PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

I

The defendant first takes exception to the pretrial comments of the trial judge made to the jury pool. In those comments, the trial judge said:

It would be the duty of the jury selected to hear this case and to find the defendant guilty of one of the charges set forth in the bill of indictment or possibly some lesser included charge.

The judge never told the prospective jurors at that time that they could also find the defendant not guilty. Defendant contends that this omission was so highly prejudicial that the jury, once empaneled, was predisposed to find him guilty even before…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. RosemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. HaskinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. WebbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API