Legal Opinion

SARALE v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 15, 2010No. C059873, C060515PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

These consolidated appeals involve claims by plaintiff landowners that Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) engaged in excessive trimming of commercially productive walnut trees located under the utility’s power lines. The first appeal is taken by plaintiffs William R. Sarale and Julie Ann Sarale from a judgment of dismissal entered by the San Joaquin Superior Court. The second appeal is taken by plaintiff Richard G. Wilbur, as a trustee, from a judgment of dismissal entered by the Yuba County Superior Court.

The trial courts in both cases sustained PG&E’s demurrers without…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People v. SmitheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lueras v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Kairy v. SuperShuttle InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Mata v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Pegastaff v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Guerrero v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API