Kairy v. SuperShuttle International
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
This case requires us to decide whether a federal district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to determine whether passenger stage corporation drivers are employees or independent contractors under California law. Specifically, we must consider whether such a decision by the district court would hinder, frustrate, interfere with, or obstruct the regulatory authority exercised by the California Public Utilities Commission over passenger stage corporations, as prohibited by California Public Utilities Code § 1759. We hold that it would not.
I. Background
The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- United States Of America, Ex El., Plaintiff v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Narayan v. EGL, INC.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Waters v. Pacific Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Gary Davis v. Hsbc Bank Nevada, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Fourth Investment Lp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Lennar Mare Island, LLC v. Steadfast InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016
- United States v. HVI Cat Canyon, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Erris Edgerly v. City and County of San FrancisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.