Guerrero v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIGGINS, J.
Plaintiffs Filomena Guerrero et al. sued Pacific Gas and Electric Company 1 for deceptively representing to California’s Public Utilities Commission 2 and the public how much revenue it required to provide safe and reliable natural gas service. The class action complaint sought restitution and disgorgement of profits for PG&E’s wrongful diversion of more than $100 million in rates it collected over a 13-year period that should have been expended on natural gas pipeline safety projects.
PG&E demurred. It argued that Public Utilities Code section 1759 3 foreclosed plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Moore v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Hendy v. LosseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Longshore v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lefebvre v. Southern California EdisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Davis v. Southern Cal. EdisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Goodwin v. Pagano CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Oswald v. Landmark BuildersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Shin v. BNSF Railway Co. CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2014