Legal Opinion

Ghaffari v. Turner Construction Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 2005No. Docket 124786, 124787PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMArkman, J.

The question presented is whether the “open and obvious” doctrine has any application in a claim brought under the “common work area” doctrine. We conclude that it does not.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

This case arises out of a slip and fall incident that occurred during construction of an IMAX theater at Henry Ford Museum in Dearborn. The premises were owned by the Edison Institute, better known as the Henry Ford Museum and Greenfield Village (Edison). Edison signed a construction contract with defendant Turner Construction Company (Turner), whereby Turner agreed to act as the construction…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Placek v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Lugo v. Ameritech Corp., Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Bertrand v. Alan Ford, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Funk v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Estes v. TitusMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Latham v. Barton Malow Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Kennedy v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. David Finazzo v. Fire Equipment CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Campbell v. KovichMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API