Legal Opinion

Latham v. Barton Malow Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 2008No. Docket 132946PublishedCited by 135 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, C. J.

In this case, we analyze what comprises the element of “readily observable and avoidable dangers” in a lawsuit involving a “common work area” of a construction site. In Funk v Gen Motors Corp,1 this Court established the common-work-area doctrine, which by its elements is not a strict-liability tort but is instead one that imposes liability only if the general contractor itself fails to prevent negligence.2 Thus, the danger cannot be just the unavoidable, perilous nature of the site itself. Rather, the danger for which a duty attaches is an avoidable danger to which a significant number of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Funk v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Hardy v. Monsanto Enviro-Chem Systems, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Ormsby v. Capital Welding, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In Re ChurchMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Greene v. a P Products, LtdMichigan Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by135 opinions

  1. Lindsey Patrick v. Virginia B TurkelsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Pioneer State Mutual Insurance v. DellsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Barclae v. ZarbMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Bronson Methodist Hospital v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. King v. Michigan State Police DepartmentMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013

130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API