Legal Opinion

Marriage of Clark v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 27, 1984No. C6-84-917PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

This is a child custody dispute. As a result of the parties’ marriage dissolution in 1980, mother Mary Bullard, f/k/a Mary Clark, was granted custody of the parties’ seven year-old son, Nathan. In 1984 father Charles Clark moved the court to modify custody so as to grant him permanent custody. The motion was granted at a default hearing and without findings under Minn. Stat. § 518.18 (1982). The court denied mother’s request to reconsider the modification and grant an evidentiary hearing. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Following the dissolution of the parties’ marriage in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Auge v. AugeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Wallin v. WallinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. Atwood v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Marriage of Hummel v. HummelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. M.M. v. R.R.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lawver v. LawverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Marriage of Clark v. BullardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. J.E.P. v. J.C.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Marriage of Vogt v. VogtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API