Legal Opinion

Robert P. Stapp MacHinery Company v. Russell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 27, 1964No. 4 Div. 179PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARWOOD, Justice.

Suit below was in detinue for a tractor. The defendant below having failed within the time allowed to execute a bond for retention of the tractor, the plaintiff executed a replevy bond in the amount of $12,000 and obtained possession of the tractor.

The trial below resulted in a verdict and judgment in .favor of the defendant. The court had prepared two verdicts for the jury, one for the plaintiff and one for the defendant.

The sole question presented on this appeal arises from the action of the court in resubmitting the case to the jury after the jury’s original return of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Tuscaloosa v. FairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Posey v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Lough v. PriceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  4. First National Bank v. La Fayette Farm Machinery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  5. King v. RobinsonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lamb v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  2. Comer v. RushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Chrysler Credit Corporation v. TremerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  4. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co. v. StuartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Rogers v. MitchellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API