Legal Opinion
City of Tuscaloosa v. Fair
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 13, 1936No. 6 Div. 793PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
Appellee sued to recover damages for personal injuries caused by stepping in a hole in August, 1932. The hole was 18 or 20 inches deep and. about 16 inches in diameter, as some of the evidence tended to show. It was near the intersection of Greensboro avenue, extending north and south, and Seventeenth street, extending east and west, in the city of Tuscaloosa.
The complaint, the claim for damages filed with the city, and much of the evidence and some of the briefs refer to the latter street as Eighteenth, and some of the evidence and briefs, and all of the maps, refer to it as…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. LansdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Southern Ry. Co. v. DicksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Tullis v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- City of Birmingham v. CarleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- City of Birmingham v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Stone v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Stone v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Black Belt Wood Co., Inc. v. SessionsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Peters v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Tatum v. Schering Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.