Legal Opinion

Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co. v. Stuart

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 6, 1981No. 79-394, 79-418PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEATTY, Justice.

Appeals by Preferred Risk and the Beaches from judgments based upon jury verdicts in favor of the Stuarts. We reverse and remand.

The plaintiffs, James and Jessie Stuart, contracted with Charles and James Beach, d/b/a Charles Beach Carpeting Company, to install a quantity of vinyl flooring in the Stuarts’ house. During the job a problem developed which necessitated separation of the upper floor from the subsurface. A quantity of gasoline was poured onto the surface to effect this separation and during that operation the gasoline ignited resulting in damage to the. house.

The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Daniels v. BloomquistSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  2. City of Tuscaloosa v. FairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Masters v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. Jacks v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  5. McGough v. SlaughterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bucyrus-Erie Co. v. Von HadenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  2. Lamb v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  3. Newport Fisherman's Supply Co. v. SchillerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
  4. Ex Parte T.D.M., 1091645 (Ala. 10-28-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  5. Lahaina Fashions, Inc. v. Bank of HawaiiHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API