Legal Opinion

Comer v. Rush

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 21, 1981No. 80-209PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff in a suit over title to a tract of land. Each party claimed title to a strip of woodland located between their farms, the plaintiff claiming title by deed and the defendant claiming title by adverse possession. The defendant attacks the judgment by raising two issues, viz.: (1) whether he was denied due process of law by the trial court's invasion of the jury's deliberations; and (2) whether he was denied due process of law by the trial court's alleged disparagement of defenses in the presence of the jury.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Winslow v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  2. Carlisle v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  3. Ray v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. McAlpine v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  5. Perry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lance, Inc. v. RamanauskasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Howard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  3. Ex Parte DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Alabama Power Co. v. EppersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Ex Parte DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API