Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Williams

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 1910No. Civ. No. 601PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Kings County refusing to change the place of trial. John G. Covert, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The appeal is from an order denying'defendant’s motion for a change of venue to the county of Los Angeles. The action was begun in Kings county wherein is located the real property in controversy. Defendant, at the time of the commencement of the action, resided and ever since has resided in the said county of Los Angeles and his contention is that the ease is one where the defendant is entitled to have the cause tried in the county of his residence.

The decision depends upon the proper application of sections 392 and 395 of the Code of Civil Procedure to the scheme of the complaint. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Kenniff v. CaulfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Grocers' Fruit Growing Union v. Kern Cty. Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Fritts v. CampCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. McFarland v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Turlock Theatre Co. v. LawsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Heffernan v. Bennett & ArmourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Terry v. Rivergarden Farms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
  4. Kopke v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. O'Gorman v. WachterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API