Legal Opinion

Smith v. Mathews Construction Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1919No. Sac. No. 2719PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment for something more than five thousand dollars, balance due for work done and materials furnished in the construction of improvements on the Forum building, in Sacramento. A lien on the property was also adjudged.

The action was based on a contract between plaintiff and defendant Mathews Construction Company and the work done and materials furnished thereunder. The contract price to be paid for plaintiff’s work and materials used for metal furring, lathing, and corner-beads and plastering and ceipenting the five-story addition to the building was $14,790, of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Connell v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Daley v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. American-Hawaiian Engineering & Construction Co. v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. City St. Improvement Co. v. City of MarysvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Herdal v. SheehyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thomas Haverty Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Patrick J. Ruane, Inc. v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Martin v. KarshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Sparling v. HousmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API