Legal Opinion

Martin v. Karsh

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 1956No. Civ. 16759PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an appeal in consolidated actions relating to the sufficiency of the performance of the contractors, Martin and Hastings, doing business as “Bayshore Construction Company” hereinafter referred to as “Bay-shore,” in constructing a concrete warehouse under a fixed fee contract for Harry Karsh, Hy Karsh and their wives, the owners of the property in Oakland on which the warehouse was built, hereinafter referred to as “Karsh.” Bay-shore instituted action 254691 to foreclose a mechanic’s lien against Karsh for the balance allegedly due under the construction contract; Karsh…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Connell v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Thomas Haverty Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. People v. RollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Smith v. Mathews Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Honolulu Roofing Co. v. FelixHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Belts v. State ex rel. Department of HighwaysIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Atlas Floor Covering v. Crescent House & Garden, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Eldred v. CL Folkman CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  5. American Continental Life Insurance v. Ranier Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API