Legal Opinion

Herdal v. Sheehy

California Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1916No. S. F. No. 6932PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The action was one for the foreclosing of a lien upon real property in the city and county of San Francisco. Defend-, ant did not dispute the following facts: William J. Sheehy, her predecessor in interest, entered into a contract with plaintiff’s assignors according to the terms of which they were to erect a building upon his land. The contract price was $3,565, payable in four installments. W. J. Sheehy filed and recorded a written acceptance of the building on March 8, 1910. All of the contract price…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Daley v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Marchant v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Yoakam v. HoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Swanson v. ThurberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Patrick J. Ruane, Inc. v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Orr v. FordeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Shumway v. WoolwineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API