Herdal v. Sheehy
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The action was one for the foreclosing of a lien upon real property in the city and county of San Francisco. Defend-, ant did not dispute the following facts: William J. Sheehy, her predecessor in interest, entered into a contract with plaintiff’s assignors according to the terms of which they were to erect a building upon his land. The contract price was $3,565, payable in four installments. W. J. Sheehy filed and recorded a written acceptance of the building on March 8, 1910. All of the contract price…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Daley v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Marchant v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by7 opinions
- Yoakam v. HoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Swanson v. ThurberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Patrick J. Ruane, Inc. v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Orr v. FordeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Shumway v. WoolwineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.